EACC

ECB | ECB and ESRB Issue Joint Report Analysing Financial Stability Risks From Geoeconomic Fragmentation

22 January 2026

Geoeconomic fragmentation and geopolitical risk have become key sources of macro-financial uncertainty, which can affect financial stability
Geopolitical shocks can amplify financial stress and dampen economic growth
Report sets out new monitoring framework integrating geopolitical indicators into financial stability analysis

The European Central Bank (ECB) and the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) today published a joint report entitled “Financial stability risks from geoeconomic fragmentation” with technical annex, which examines how rising geopolitical risks and heightened uncertainty can affect financial stability in the euro area and across the European Union. The report identifies the key transmission channels through which geopolitical shocks can propagate to the financial system.
The following findings indicate that geopolitical shocks and policy uncertainty tend to lead to tighter financial conditions, financial market stress, increased risk premia and reduced loan growth.

Geopolitical risks and policy uncertainty have risen markedly since the mid‑2010s, with notable increases in 2024 and 2025. At the same time, financial market volatility has remained contained or short-lived.
Estimates suggest that geopolitical risks lower expected growth outcomes, with significant downside tail risks for the real economy, accompanied by heightened financial stress. Geopolitical events can significantly alter the interconnectedness between bonds, commodities, equities and exchange rates.
The impact of geopolitical shocks is heterogeneous across EU Member States, whereby more open economies and those with higher public debt ratios tend to be more vulnerable to amplification effects.
In response to geopolitical shocks, banks and non-banks adjust their balance sheets by reducing lending, especially cross-border exposures. While this reduces the financial system’s exposure to external shocks, it also limits international diversification.

At a time of accelerating geoeconomic fragmentation and persistent geopolitical uncertainty, the ECB and the ESRB stress the importance of enhanced, more harmonised datasets, as well as complementary scenario analyses, for preserving financial stability and increasing economic resilience.[1]The report’s insights can help policymakers and financial institutions to better detect and evaluate geopolitical risks for the financial sector and calibrate macroprudential policy responses.
Notes

The report was prepared by financial stability experts under a joint workstream of the ECB’s Macroprudential Analysis Group and the ESRB’s Analysis Working Group.

Geopolitical risk is an important consideration for European banks and supervisors as they navigate global risks. In view of this, ECB Banking Supervision made geopolitical risk the focus of the adverse scenario in the 2025 stress test of euro area banks (see Box 6) and will assess banks on their geopolitical risk management in the context of the 2026 reverse stress test.

 
 
Compliments of the European Central Bank The post ECB | ECB and ESRB Issue Joint Report Analysing Financial Stability Risks From Geoeconomic Fragmentation first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.

Read More
EACC

IMF | Global Economy Shakes Off Tariff Shock Amid Tech-Driven Boom

Blog Post by  Tobias Adrian and Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas
Global Economy Shakes Off Tariff Shock Amid Tech-Driven Boomrisks are rising, including from the concentration of tech investment and the negative effects of trade disruptions, which may build over time.
Global economic growth continues to show notable resilience despite significant US-led trade disruptions and heightened uncertainty. Our latest projections indicate that global growth will hold steady at 3.3 percent this year, an upward revision of 0.2 percentage points compared to October estimates, with most of the improvement accounted for by the United States and China. Remarkably, current projections are broadly unchanged from a year earlier, as the global economy shakes off the immediate impact of the tariff shock.

This surprising strength reflects a confluence of factors, including easing trade tensions, higher-than-expected fiscal stimulus, accommodative financial conditions, the agility of the private sector in mitigating trade disruptions and improved policy frameworks especially in emerging market economies.
Another key driver of this resilience is the continued surge in investment in the information technology sector—especially in artificial intelligence. While manufacturing activity remains subdued, IT investment as a share of US economic output has surged to the highest level since 2001, providing a major boost to overall business investment and activity. Although this IT surge has been concentrated in the United States, it is also generating positive spillovers globally, most notably to Asia’s technology exports.

Financial conditions fuel expansion
The IT investment boom reflects businesses and markets’ optimism about the transformative potential of recent tech innovations—in automation and AI—to deliver sizable productivity gains and to lift profits. Since late 2022, coinciding with the introduction of the first widely used generative-AI tools, stock prices have risen sharply.
Favorable financial conditions and robust earnings­­ have supported rising stock prices and helped fund new capital spending. But as the expansion accelerates, debt financing is becoming more prevalent, increasing leverage. This shift introduces notable risks: higher leverage could amplify shocks if returns fail to materialize, or if broader financial conditions tighten, adversely impacting firms and raising concerns about spillovers to the broader financial system.
Moreover, profitability could become sensitive to assumptions around depreciation schedules for advanced processors. Frequent equipment upgrades will squeeze profit margins, weigh on earnings, and require significant additional debt financing. These factors underscore the importance of monitoring leverage accumulation and its potential to amplify vulnerabilities.
Lessons from the dot-com era
The comparison with the dot-com boom of 1995-2000 is instructive. Even though IT investment as a share of gross domestic product is broadly similar to levels then, the recent rise has been more gradual, accelerating markedly only last year. Furthermore, while market valuations relative to economic output have expanded at a similar pace in both episodes, the rise in price-earnings ratios has been more modest in the current boom given more robust earnings.
Overall, our analysis suggests that potential overvaluation for the broad equity index in the United States is only about half that of the dot-com episode. That said, the overall vulnerability of global macroeconomic growth to a repricing of technology stocks may be substantial for three reasons.

First, rising stock prices over the past few years have been driven predominantly by the technology sector, in particular AI-related stocks, and this narrow group has become a major driver of the index. Second, many critical AI-related firms are not currently listed on stock markets. Their debt borrowings could have consequences that were not seen during the dot-com era. Third, market capitalization is now much higher relative to output, from 132 percent in 2001 to 226 percent now for the United States; so even a more modest correction could have a sizable effect on overall consumption.

Risks to the outlook
Looking ahead, the current tech boom raises important upside and downside risks for the global economy. On the upside, AI could start to deliver on its productivity promises, raising US and global activity by 0.3 percent this year, relative to the baseline.
On the downside, AI firms could fail to deliver earnings commensurate with their lofty valuations, and investor sentiment could sour. For reference, a scenario in our October 2025 World Economic Outlook—which included a moderate correction in AI stock valuations with a tightening of financial conditions—reduces global growth by 0.4 percent relative to the baseline. This could have far-reaching consequences if real investment in technology sectors declines more sharply, triggering a costly reallocation of capital and labor. Combined with lower-than-expected total factor productivity gains, and a more significant correction in equity markets, global output losses could increase further, concentrated in tech-heavy regions such as the United States and Asia.
Given the decade-long increase in foreign ownership of US equities, this sharp correction could also trigger sizable wealth losses outside the United States and exert a drag on consumption, spreading the downturn more globally. Even economies that have little exposure to technology, including many high-debt and low-income countries, would be buffeted by negative external demand spillovers and higher external borrowing costs.
Such downside risks arise at a time of heightened geopolitical uncertainty, increased use of export controls on critical inputs and trade-related restraints, and eroded fiscal space in many countries. This could interact with any reassessment of AI-related productivity growth and repricing of risky asset valuations in a self-reinforcing manner.
Policy for stability, discipline, inclusion
With asset valuations stretched, debt financing on the rise, and uncertainty elevated, strong prudential oversight is essential to safeguard financial stability. Supervision and regulation should ensure robust underwriting standards by banks and nonbanks especially those exposed to the technology sector. Internationally agreed standards on bank capital and liquidity should be adhered to. Policymakers must be ready to deploy contingency plans for diverse risks.
Monetary policy faces a delicate balancing act. If the tech boom continues, it may push real neutral interest rates higher—as occurred during the dot-com era—calling for a monetary policy tightening. This would contract fiscal space, especially in countries that do not get a growth boost from AI.
Should the downside scenario materialize, the rapid decline in aggregate demand will call for a speedy reduction in policy rates.
Proper diagnosis and calibration of the monetary policy to achieve price stability requires that central banks operate within their mandate. Central bank independence remains paramount for monetary and financial stability and economic growth, protecting the credibility of monetary policy and anchoring inflation expectations.
On the fiscal side, governments should renew efforts to reduce public debt and restore fiscal space where needed.
AI’s uneven impact on workers is another important consideration. While innovation drives growth, it risks displacing jobs and depressing wages for certain segments of the workforce. Policies should focus on lowering barriers to adoption, helping workers to invest in the right skills, supporting job mobility through targeted programs, and maintaining competitive markets to facilitate entry and ensure that innovation benefits are broadly shared.
Balancing act
Global growth has been impressively resilient amid trade disruptions, but this masks underlying fragilities tied to the concentration of investment in the tech sector. And the negative growth effects of trade disruptions are likely to build up over time.
AI-driven investment offers transformative potential—but also introduces financial and structural risks that demand vigilance. The challenge for policymakers and investors alike is to balance optimism with prudence, ensuring that today’s tech surge translates into sustainable, inclusive growth rather than another boom-bust cycle. This is especially relevant in an environment marked by intensifying geopolitical strains and growing threats to institutional frameworks which make the implementation of good policies more challenging.
 
 
Compliments of the IMFThe post IMF | Global Economy Shakes Off Tariff Shock Amid Tech-Driven Boom first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.

EACC & Member News

AKD: Competition law update January 2026: rulings by the Court of Justice on the application of the Bronner criteria and vertical margin squeeze and more

December saw a number of important developments in the field of competition law. This month, we highlight rulings by the Court of Justice on the application of the Bronner criteria and vertical margin squeeze, the abuse of a dominant position in connection with fees charged by collective management organisations for copyrights, and the ACM’s response to the critical opinion of the Council of State on the bill concerning the ACM’s power of intervention.

Read more

EACC & Member News

Taylor Wessing: New legislative proposal: legal protection in public procurement

We informed you about the critical advice of the Advisory Division of the Council of State (Advisory Division) on the draft text of the legislative proposal on Legal Protection in Public Procurement (legislative proposal). On 22 December 2025, the Minister of Economic Affairs (the Minister) published an amended legislative proposal. This amended legislative proposal will be debated in the House of Representatives.

Read more

EACC

European Commission | EU Supports Digital Connectivity with Simpler and Harmonised Rules in Digital Networks Act

The European Commission proposed the Digital Networks Act (DNA) to modernise, simplify and harmonise EU rules on connectivity networks. The current rules must be updated to create the conditions for operators to invest into rolling out advanced fibre and mobile networks. High-capacity networks enable innovative tech, like Artificial Intelligence and Cloud. The widespread availability of advanced connectivity for people and businesses across the EU is the foundation of Europe’s competitiveness.
Strengthening the single market for connectivity
The proposal aims at creating an effective EU single market by harmonising rules and facilitating cross-border business to incentivise operators to scale up, grow and innovate. To enable this, the Digital Networks Act proposal aims to:

facilitate companies to provide services across the EU while having to register in only one Member State;

incentivise the creation of pan-European satellite communication services by establishing an EU-level, as opposed to national level, spectrum authorisation framework;
increase regulatory consistency in national spectrum authorisation, by giving operators longer spectrum licences and by making licences renewable by default to increase predictability;
ensure that all available spectrum is being used by making spectrum sharing among operators more common (‘use it or share it’); and
introduce a voluntary cooperation mechanism between connectivity providers and other players, such as content application and cloud providers.

Transition to advanced connectivity networks
Legacy copper networks do not fit the ambition of making innovative technologies widely available across the EU. The DNA introduces mandatory national transition plans to ensure the phase out of copper networks and the transition to advanced networks between 2030 and 2035. Member States must present their national plans in 2029. The process is accompanied by safeguards to protect all consumers, such as providing clear and timely information about switch-offs and ensuring service continuity.
Simplification and investment
The Digital Networks Act modernises the regulatory framework, reducing administrative burden and reporting obligations, so companies can focus their resources on investment and innovation. The DNA also allows more flexibility for business-to-business relations, while keeping a high level of consumer protection.
Secure and resilient connectivity
The DNA enhances network security and resilience by limiting dependencies in the connectivity ecosystem and promoting EU-level cooperation. The proposal introduces an EU-level Preparedness plan to tackle the rising risks of crises including natural disasters and foreign interference in networks. In addition, the common mechanism for selecting pan-EU satellite communications will incorporate criteria focused on security and resilience.
Protecting net neutrality in innovative services
The DNA fully keeps the principles of net neutrality. It introduces a mechanism to clarify Open Internet rules for innovative services to increase legal certainty and a voluntary ecosystem cooperation mechanism on IP interconnection, traffic efficiency, and other emerging areas.
Next steps
The proposal will be presented to the European Parliament and the Council for approval.
Background
The DNA proposal will replace the 2018 EU Electronic Communications Code.
In February 2024, the Commission’s White Paper “How to master Europe’s digital infrastructure needs?” aimed to explore scenarios and gather insights to shape policy actions for the Union’s digital infrastructure sector.
In her 2025 State of the Union Address, President von der Leyen stressed advancing the Single Market for connectivity by 2028 and encouraged investment in transformative technologies.
 
 
Compliments of the European CommissionThe post European Commission | EU Supports Digital Connectivity with Simpler and Harmonised Rules in Digital Networks Act first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.

EACC & Member News

Bird & Bird: Global trends in anti-corruption and anti-bribery

In this article, we look back at trends and enforcement developments in anti-corruption and anti-bribery in 2025 and we look ahead to what we can expect to shape this rapidly evolving landscape in 2026. What emerges from our review is a picture of institutional reform and a sharpening of enforcement tools, with anti-corruption and anti-bribery compliance as a strategic priority.

Read more

EACC & Member News

Loyens & Loeff: Dutch Supreme Court curbs excessive tax interest rate (corporate income tax)

On 16 January 2026, the Dutch Supreme Court ruled that the 8% tax interest rate applicable to corporate income tax assessments is disproportionate and violates the principle of equality. As a result, the applicable tax interest rate is reduced to 4%. As the State Secretary for Finance has included all similar objections in a mass objection procedure, the judgment has direct effect on all taxpayers that have filed objections against the amount of tax interest included in the CIT assessment.

EACC

EUIPO | EUIPO Records the Highest Number of Applications in its History

In 2025, the European Union Intellectual Property Office received 327 735 new applications for EU trade marks and EU designs. It is the highest annual number of intellectual property (IP) applications since the Office began accepting filings in 1996.
Overall, it represents a 7.8% increase compared to 2024, surpassing the previous record set in 2021 (313 928 applications received)
Trade Marks Drive Overall Growth
European Union trade marks (EUTMs) accounted for the largest share of applications in 2025. The EUIPO received 196 886 EUTM applications, an increase of 9.1% compared to 2024.
Applicants based in EU Member States drove this growth, with filings rising by 9.4%. The 27 EU countries together accounted for over 57.5% of all European Union trade marks applications received. Germany (12.7%), Italy (6.9%) and Spain (6.4%) were the most active countries.
Outside of the EU, applications from China also continued to increase, growing by 13.3% (accounting for almost 16% of all EUTMs). The USA (9%) and the UK (4.2%) complete the top three.
Regarding products and services, ‘advertising and business management’, ‘electrical apparatus’ and ‘technological services’ are among the main ones requested. Followed by ‘education and sporting activities’ and ‘clothing and footwear’.
Together, these trends confirm the continued relevance of the EUTM system for businesses operating both within and beyond the European Union.
Design Filings Reach New Highs
Demand for EU designs (EUDs) also increased in 2025. The EUIPO received 130 849 design applications, marking a 6% rise and the second consecutive year of record-breaking figures.
For the first time, applications from outside the EU accounted for the majority of design filings, representing 52% of all EUD applications.
China emerged as the leading source country in 2025, with filings increasing by 18.4% (accounting for 29.9 % of all EUDs applications received), followed by the United Kingdom (+17.8%) and the United States (+8.4%). These figures underline the growing international importance of the EU design system.
Within the EU, filings were led by Germany (13.4%), followed by Italy (10.5%), Poland (4.2%), France (4%) and Spain (3.4%).
New Competence for Craft and Industrial Geographical Indications
In December 2025, the EUIPO began accepting applications for craft and industrial geographical indications (CIGIs), marking a significant expansion of the Office’s mandate.
Within the first weeks of operation, the EUIPO received 45 CIGI applications, with stones and minerals and textiles as the main products represented.
The new system aims to support local value creation and strengthen competitiveness in regions across the European Union.
Looking Ahead
These results provide a strong starting point for the second year of the EUIPO Strategic Plan 2030.
Sustained growth in filings shows that businesses, innovators and creators worldwide continue to invest in protection through the European Union’s IP system.
The record figures recorded in 2025 confirm confidence in the EUIPO and its role in supporting a modern, resilient and inclusive European innovation ecosystem.
 
Click here to explore the charts and figures.
Disclaimer: These figures are provisional and subject to final confirmation.
 
 

Compliments of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)The post EUIPO | EUIPO Records the Highest Number of Applications in its History first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.

EACC

European Council | Artificial Intelligence: Council Paves the Way for the Creation of AI Gigafactories

The Council has adopted today an amendment to the regulation governing the activities of the European High-Performance Computing Joint Undertaking (EuroHPC JU), extending its objectives to facilitate the creation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) gigafactories in Europe and to include a dedicated quantum technologies pillar.
The amended regulation allows for the development and operation of AI gigafactories in Europe, a world-class AI compute infrastructure that will strengthen Europe’s industry and competitiveness, while fostering cooperation through public-private partnerships that include member states and industry stakeholders. It also sets rules for funding and procurement, while safeguarding the interests of start-ups and scale-ups. The amendment provides flexibility for partners, enabling them to optimise results while advancing Europe’s leadership in AI and quantum technologies.

“Today, we’ve taken a bold and swift step towards proceeding with establishing AI gigafactories in Europe. AI is one of the most critical technologies of our time, defining our digital future, and investing in the needed infrastructure capacity for AI is essential for boosting Europe’s resilience, competitiveness, and sovereignty. This move demonstrates our commitment to ensuring that Europe leads in this transformative field.”
Nicodemos Damianou, Cyprus deputy minister of research, innovation and digital policy

Next steps
Following the Council’s approval, the legislative act has been adopted. The regulation will be published in the Official Journal of the European Union on 19th of January and will enter into force on the following day.
Background
EuroHPC aims to develop, deploy, and maintain supercomputing, quantum computing, and data infrastructure in the EU, while also supporting the growth of high performing computing (HPC) systems, technologies, and skills for European science and industry. The EuroHPC regulation was amended in 2024 to include the development and operation of AI Factories —dynamic ecosystems that promote innovation and collaboration in artificial intelligence. The Commission’s proposed second amendment, introduced on 15 July 2025, builds on this by supporting the establishment of AI gigafactories, further advancing Europe’s leadership in AI innovation.
 
 
 
Compliments of the European CouncilThe post European Council | Artificial Intelligence: Council Paves the Way for the Creation of AI Gigafactories first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.

EACC

ECB | Monetary Policy and Financial Stability in the Euro Area

Speech by Luis de Guindos, Vice-President of the ECB, at the 16th edition of Spain Investors Day

Madrid, 14 January 2026
The global economy is facing a period of profound transformation and heightened uncertainty. The past year has brought major shifts in the international economic environment, driven by significant changes in US policy and the erosion of the multilateral, rules-based system which has long supported global trade and international relations. The introduction of substantial tariffs on US imports has disrupted trade flows, weakened confidence and created ripple effects across economies. Geopolitical risks remain elevated. The shift to a new paradigm – one where rule of law principles are challenged – reflects profound global uncertainties that are likely to persist.
These developments have had tangible implications for economic activity and financial stability in the euro area. Heightened uncertainty weighs on growth prospects through two main channels: by delaying firms’ investment decisions and so affecting euro area exports, and by prompting households to increase precautionary savings and consume less than expected. At the same time, fiscal policy in several euro area countries is set to ease to accommodate higher spending, including for military and security purposes. In this environment, disrupted trade patterns can further complicate inflation dynamics. Financial stability risks remain elevated as valuations are stretched in increasingly concentrated asset markets, non-banks exhibit liquidity and leverage vulnerabilities and increasing interlinkages with banks, while growing private markets remain opaque.
Euro area Monetary Policy
Inflation remains in a good place: having hovered within a narrow range since the spring, it stood at 2.0% in December. Energy prices were lower than a year ago, while core inflation, which excludes energy and food, also fell slightly. Strong wage growth continues to push up underlying inflation. However, more forward-looking indicators point to wage growth easing in the coming quarters, before stabilising towards the end of 2026. Our most recent assessment reconfirms that inflation should stabilise at the 2% target in the medium term.
Despite the challenging environment, economic activity has been resilient. It grew by 0.3% in the third quarter of 2025, mainly reflecting stronger consumption and investment. Growth was largely driven by the services sector, while activity in industry and construction remained flat. The economy also continues to benefit from a robust labour market, with unemployment close to its historical low.
Compared with earlier projections, economic growth has been revised up to stand above 1% this year and rise to 1.4% in the following years. Given the challenging environment for global trade, domestic demand is seen as the main engine of growth in the coming quarters. Business investment and substantial government spending on infrastructure and defence should increasingly underpin the economy. Consumption is also expected to rise but the household saving rate is only gradually coming down from still elevated levels. According to a recent ECB survey, the main reasons for high savings by euro area households include the fear of higher taxes in the future (Ricardian motives) and concerns about their future income (precautionary motives).[1]
Ricardian saving motives are linked to consumers’ expectations about future developments in taxes and welfare spending. Saving scores are thus higher in euro area countries with weaker fiscal positions, such as those with public debt-to-GDP ratios above 100%.[2] Precautionary saving motives are linked to income risk, which is strongly influenced by differences in individual perceptions about uncertainty. Elevated uncertainty and geopolitical developments also pose risks to business investment, with significant repercussions for euro area exports.
Risk Environment
As an open economy deeply integrated into global supply chains and international financial markets, the euro area is exposed to external shocks and vulnerabilities stemming from geopolitical and trade developments. China has become increasingly competitive in key export sectors of euro area countries, with its share of global exports rising steadily, particularly in advanced manufacturing and green technology sectors.
But high uncertainty in the global environment does not appear to be reflected in current market pricing.[3] In fact, negative surprises – such as a re-escalation of trade or other geopolitical tensions, setbacks in AI advances with asset price adjustments or intensifying doubts regarding US fiscal credibility – could trigger abrupt shifts in sentiment, with spillovers across asset classes and geographies.
Geopolitical risk noticeably raises downside risks to growth.[4] Countries more reliant on trade, or burdened with higher levels of public debt, are at greater risk of amplification effects and resulting downside pressures.
Inflation could be affected in different directions: it could be lower if the rise in US tariffs reduced demand for euro area exports and if countries with overcapacity increased their exports to the euro area; or higher if more fragmented global supply chains pushed up import prices, curtailed the supply of critical raw materials and added to capacity constraints in the euro area economy.
On the financial side, the heightened uncertainty could result in higher risk premia, tighter lending conditions and weaker loan growth. While financial markets appear to price in very benign outcomes and downplay tail risks, safe-haven flows into gold have driven up prices to record highs, signaling high geopolitical risk and policy uncertainty.
The materialisation of geopolitical risks could form a common trigger for three of the main sources of risk and vulnerability for euro area financial stability today.[5]
First, stretched valuations in increasingly concentrated asset markets raise the risk of sharp, correlated asset price adjustments. Sudden market drawdowns could pose challenges to euro area non-banks, especially given their liquidity and leverage vulnerabilities, increasing the risk of fire sales. And opaque private equity and private markets could easily cause or amplify market downturns.
Second, growing interlinkages between banks and the non-bank financial sector could expose funding vulnerabilities in stressed market conditions.[6] As non-banks provide short-term funding to banks while banks provide credit for the leveraged activities of the non-bank sector, exposures are at risk on both sides of banks’ balance sheets.
Third, fiscal challenges in some advanced economies could test investor confidence, possibly triggering stress in sovereign bond markets. Market concerns over US fiscal credibility have risen on the back of persistently high fiscal deficits and have contributed to a steepening of yield curves. This may create risk spillovers from the United States to the euro area amplified by policy uncertainty and a depreciating dollar. Fiscal fundamentals in some euro area countries have also been persistently weak. That said, financial markets have so far smoothly accommodated high levels of issuance, but structural challenges could further limit the fiscal space.
Planned defence spending to meet the new NATO target, ageing populations and climate change, with the associated physical and transition risks, represent major challenges. To mitigate the current risks to the sustainability of sovereign debt, excessive fiscal deficits and public debts in the euro area need to be reduced in line with the revised economic governance framework. The consolidation of public finances should be designed in a growth-friendly way and combined with strategic investment and growth-enhancing structural reforms.
EU Challenges Ahead
In this uncertain macro-financial environment, preserving the resilience of banks and the broader financial system remains crucial. Banks should maintain sound solvency and liquidity positions to enable them to absorb potential shocks ahead. At the same time, we are making significant efforts to reduce undue complexities and simplify EU banking rules and the reporting and supervisory framework for banks. In view of the growing importance of the non-bank sector, it is also vital to monitor it more closely and strengthen its regulation from a macroprudential perspective.
We are facing a big change in the world order with mounting geopolitical challenges. The only viable path forward is to sustain our European values and promote stronger cooperation and deeper integration within Europe. To strengthen Europe’s growth prospects and reduce its vulnerability to future shocks, we need more Europe, not less. Unlocking the full potential of the Single Market is crucial, as is completing the banking union. A truly integrated market for goods and services would advance progress towards the savings and investments union, reduce national fragmentation and support deeper and more efficient capital markets.
The world has changed, and Europe has to adapt to this new paradigm. Greater cooperation and integration are not optional – they are the only way forward for Europe.
 

See ECB (2026), ECB Consumer Expectations Survey results – November 2025, 8 January. While other saving motives, such as intertemporal substitution and saving out of habit, are also significant, they scored slightly lower in importance.
In the survey, Ricardian motives are validated by the finding that respondents reporting trust in their national government assign a significantly lower importance to the Ricardian saving motive relative to respondents who distrust their government. These survey results are consistent with those of Tabellini, G. (2010), “Culture and Institutions: Economic Development in the Regions of Europe”, Journal of the European Economic Association, Vol. 8, No 4, pp. 677-716.
See Financial Stability Review, ECB, November 2025.
See ECB/ESRB report on the financial stability risks from geoeconomic risks, forthcoming January 2026.
See footnote 3.
Bochmann, P., Dieckelmann, D., Grodzicki, M., Horan, A., Larkou, C. and Lenoci, F. (2025), “Systemic risks in linkages between banks and the non-bank financial sector”, Financial Stability Review, ECB, November.

 
 
 
Compliments of the European Central Bank The post ECB | Monetary Policy and Financial Stability in the Euro Area first appeared on European American Chamber of Commerce New York [EACCNY] | Your Partner for Transatlantic Business Resources.